The world of politics often feels like a high-stakes chess game, with each move carefully calculated to outmaneuver the opponent. But every now and then, a piece on the board decides to flip the script, making a bold, unexpected move. In the case of Kamala Harris, that move came in the form of her first original campaign promise.
Harris has often been in the spotlight for her role in the current administration’s economic decisions. Her track record includes casting the tie-breaking vote that pushed President Biden’s American Rescue Plan through the Senate.
BREAKING: Big Pharma In Outrage Over This Breakthrough Natural Painkiller
Her vote, many argue, set the stage for the inflationary woes plaguing the nation today. Now, in a twist that few saw coming, Harris is doubling down on her approach to the economy, but not in the way anyone might have expected. Her idea is so bad, critics were quick to point out what she will do to the country’s food supply.
Vice President Kamala Harris was slammed on Wednesday evening after her campaign announced that she would be revealing leftist price control measures to reign in inflation…
Harris will “impose stiff penalties in the food industry,” the campaign said…
“Kamala Harris is literally proposing price controls on food,” said RealClearPolitics senior writer Mark Hemingway. “This is literally what the Soviets did and the results will be scarcity and higher costs.”
Government-imposed price control is a terrible idea because it makes the economy worse by causing shortages. Everyone who survived socialism/communism knows this: if the store shelves are empty, it doesn't matter how low the government claims the price of bread is. https://t.co/fa65WzeMTK
— Helen Raleigh (@HRaleighspeaks) August 15, 2024
In a move that’s already being compared to the failed economic strategies of the Soviet Union, Kamala Harris announced her plan to introduce federal price controls on groceries. Yes, you read that right—price controls, a policy straight out of the socialist playbook. According to Harris, this drastic measure is necessary to combat what she and the administration have dubbed “corporate greed” in the food industry.
But critics aren’t buying it. RealClearPolitics senior writer Mark Hemingway didn’t mince words, pointing out that “Kamala Harris is literally proposing price controls on food… This is literally what the Soviets did and the results will be scarcity and higher costs.” The comparison isn’t just hyperbole—it’s a historical fact that government-imposed price controls have often led to shortages, as businesses struggle to meet demand at artificially low prices.
Helen Raleigh, an immigrant from communist China, took to social media to share her firsthand experience with the dangers of such policies. “Government-imposed price control is a terrible idea because it makes the economy worse by causing shortages,” Raleigh wrote. “Everyone who survived socialism/communism knows this: if the store shelves are empty, it doesn’t matter how low the government claims the price of bread is.”
Harris’s plan didn’t just draw ire from economic experts—it also sparked a wave of mockery online. Republican strategist Matt Whitlock summed up the sentiment by calling the proposal “absurd,” highlighting the irony of Harris trying to fix a problem she helped create with yet another round of government intervention.
David Bernstein, author and keen observer of political theater, chimed in with a sarcastic take: “A federal ban on price gouging! Why didn’t anyone think of that before? We can just order prices to come down by government fiat! What could go wrong?” His point is clear—this isn’t a serious solution to inflation, but rather a gimmick designed to appeal to voters who might not fully grasp the complexities of economic policy.
TRENDING: Eat This - Never Forget A Single Thing Again
Even within Harris’s own party, there are whispers of concern. Some see this move as another attempt to distract from the administration’s failures by creating a convenient villain in the form of “greedy corporations.” But as popular conservative commentator AG noted, the real issue isn’t price gouging in an industry with razor-thin margins—it’s the broader economic policies that have led us to this point.
In the end, Harris’s latest policy proposal might do more to solidify her reputation as a politician more focused on optics than substance. As one observer put it, “Kamala Harris is running a marketing campaign for president that isn’t even attempting to provide any real substance.”
;void(0);){kind=link}